Carlo Suares claimed there was an opening in the '60s of the hidden definitions of the A- T. This writing is anthurs attempt to develop his part of the opening. Interested readers are encouraged to ask for clarifications to the imperfect expressions herein. For thirty years, since CYPHER appeared to him at 40, the writer has looked for others who had appreciated Suares--who had develop[ed on his work. In vain. Surely the light that came thru the opening to Suares fell on another receptive soul. Anyone honestly imagining to develop the opening must consider obtaining a hebrew/english or french or...dictionary. He must obtain a copy of the first verse of Torah and consider reading Suares.
In Cypher of Genesis Carlo tells us the symbols of the Hebrew alphabet are Hieroglyphjs, elements of thought that anyone can observe in his thinking. After many years the writer awakenmed to the simplicity of this. The long time it took to awasken to what Carlo had stated clearly points to the difficulty that others will find. Two examples will be given: Baht, Number two and Waw number six. Carlo tells us that Baht is any concept---a label for a group of similar things. A thing is either in the container of similar things or it is outside the container so another connotation of Baht is "in." Carlo says that the sixth Hieroglyph is the interfertilization of one thing with another--Jack and Jill, gasoline and motor. All humans have the ability to interfertilize this and that and.....Carloi tells us that there are 9 archtypal Hglyphs. He gives us a nine column by three row matrix in which to order the 27 Hglphs in Torah. The first row are the archtypes applicable when the sense is always--in general. The second row are these archtypes expressed in existence--things with beginings and endings. The third row are the archtypal elements expressed in the moment. Carlos calls these cosmic--physical. The writer has been able to follow very few of the archrypes down a column; these will be given shortly.
Carlo tells us that "openings" of this knowledge occurred in times labeled Abraham, Moises, Jesus These "openings" imply closed knowledge opened at times when new symbols had just been introduced. Obviously the opening to Carlo followed Frued--Jungian psychology jargon. We note that he blames the psyche for resisting, obscuring the system. He dioesn't mention Talmudists per se. .Obviously the opening was to him.. There is no indication that he laboriously determined the Hglyhs from written sources and his own intuition. Someone opened to him. Chose him due to his Jungianness and Egyptian. pedigreed. He shows no sign of having spent effort with a Heb/French or English dictionary-thesaurus. There are too many cases where obvious, easy to see explanations of mysterious phrases in the bible weren't found/mentioned by Carlo. He was given--opened to. Opening implies the general state of closed--hidden.
The writer observed another opening in the '60s when Carlo wrote. The Parade Sunday supplement about Sept. 1965 had an article claiming that a Jewish male over 40 who had memorized Torah and read sll of Talmud and other works could ask to be taught what the individual symbols meant. He would be told if he promised not to speak of this till he was 50. This made sense to the writer who was a grad, student in Phbysics---who was expected to feel something while viewing a formula of symbols. At the time the psyche of the writer rationalized this with not placing pearls before one who wouldn't learn basics. He now feels the rules are to ensure the person is so steeped in Talmud he will be prejudiced to understand along those lines. 50 gives the teachers time to see if he has been prejudiced enough and isn't speaking of individual discoveries that he shares. Hiding.
Cabal--A secret meeting of Jews was the medieval definition, The writer now feels that cabala is the product of the cabal that serves to hide the definitions of the Hglyphs. Suares labels the Hglyph system cabala. Likely the opener didn't disagree with him. One of our tasks is to remain opn to the possibility that cabala is product of the cabal or there is evidence that the term cabala predates the cabal or.....
The Pharisees are written to have asked Jesus, "why are you speaking of these things and you are not yet 50?" Evidence that the hiding existed back then. We must imagine there is a move to hide this writing./ Why? The reader is encouraged to provide an alternative to the motive being to support the idea of a "God" who justifies/demands that Israel dominate/capture Philistia/Palestine. Making other sense of Torah would challenge these stories wrapped about Torah by the Septuagint."Tradition" tells us Ptolomy asked that he be told in Greek what Torah said. 6 wise men from each of 12 tribes collected in Alexandria and stayed in 72 rooms for 6 weeks. They came out with 72 identical copies of the Greek "transalation" of Torah. Stories. Some would have us believe god inspired them. Others that they memorized a '"translation" before delivering it. Others admit it's a story on the order of the stories they delivered.
Apiru is the search term for those open to idea that there were no Hebrew people, no Hebrew language--that Torah is formulas only, understandable by those who understand the Hieroglyphs.....One group of glyphs-word- had to mean several things according to the set of stories in which it appears--thus the leavening--adding of vowels--the air in the bread. Carlo ignores the leavening and so does the writer who has used Carlo's revelations to get sense out of the first verse of Tolrah and is hereby asking for help with subsequent verses which can be considered addenda since the first verse is so powerful/explanatory.
The Heb/Eng dictionary tells us that BN ADM can be translateed three ways according to its leavening. Son of Adam; Son of Man; soul. Consider that members of the cabal helped King James synchophants to choose Son of Man. Consider the possibility that Torah describes the soul and that Jesus volunteered to be a symbol of the soul. When he's written to say this is my body, eat this in remembrance of me he is holding Torah-- Allegorically eating it with his eyes . The film will be made and since seeing is believing, viewers will believe that the TEACHER had a book at the table and was more interested in encouraging feeding from that book than from calories. The reader can see Jesus holding the scroll in front of his eyes, citing it as his body and asking disciples to feed from it. This "seeing" is what the first verse tells us. the little visions we "see" and the words with which we "realize" them are the unique description of the ability that humans have that other animals don't. In the dictionary HSMYM is "translated" realize and King James pleaders termed it Heaven. Appreciation of allegory will make this work joyous, productive and there is a special formula that the stories say brings the light on allegories. YHWH. We will enumerate stories in which the LORD brings the light. Some readers will actually go to the source delivered in a Moscow synagogue in 1893.
The Hebrew
alphabet are symbols of the elements of human thought. The human soul
is embodied in these elements. They are arrayed naturally in a nine
column by three row matrix. The first row are archetypes, The second
row are these archetypes expressed in existence—things with
beginnings and endings. The third row are archetypes expresses
right-now—physically. The three rows are the three kinds of
time—always; in duration; the moment.
The nine columns of first and second row and first four of the third have specific names. The last five of third row have five of the 22 specific names and the word final as they only appear t the end of a “word”--glyph group. This can be seen visually on page 65 in Carlo Suares' book Cipher of Genesis and psych.com.
Carlo claims that this code has been “opened” to the world a few times when there appeare a novel representation system; he mentions Christ as an exponent of Greek-think; Plato is given credit for the three in one god. Carlo is obviously implying it was “opened” to him as an exponent of Jungian Psychology. Obvious that someone gave him the giver's opinion. There's no indication that Carlo “figured out” the definitions of the symbols himself. He does not indicate he has studied a Hebrew/French or English dictionary. He writes that one who understands the system will recognize the element in his own thinking. This writer feels that his definitions are less ambiguous than those offered by Carlo and better agreeing with the dictionaries.
Aleph cypher value one dictionary gives –training--. Intelligence defined as ability to be trained
Yod duration of training a recording—in brain, book,etc.
Qof cypher value 100 –physically it is student aping teacher
Bayt cypher value two. A concept, symbol for a group of similar things. Dictionary gives container, in. In the container of similar things.
Kaf cypher value 2. concept existing between beginning and ending is definitely room for thought.
Raysh cypher value 200 stories hint this can describe lung physical thought-spirit container.
Ghimmel Carlo gives –spirit--
Lammed—30 Dict. Gives teaching, learning out with old, in with new. An organ transforms in process. Air pressure transformed to varied output of frequencies of pressures. N.T. writers tell us Pharisees couldn't take back 30 moneys because it was blood moneys. In allegory blood is teaching/learning of soul.
Sheen 300 stories give “breath of god”, breath physically in and out of lungs-breath physical organic activity of learning.
Dallet 4 form Plato used term; Writer has no definition. Carlo notes that YHWH with S before W is translated Christ; with D after W translated Judah, Judas, Jew.
Mem 40 stories mention womb.It is a duration of forming.
Tav 400 Carlo wrote that physicists would recognize this as -force- At least that is physical.
Hay 5 Carlo gives life. Propagation? Life in thought, spirit uses memory-symbol.
Noun 50 Writer hasn't worked to find indication that a noun brings a thing into life in existence.
Kaf final 500. Living idea physically. expressed
Waw-Vav 6 AND, copulation
Sammekh 60 Carlo writes “female element of coupling.” Receptive?
Zayn 7 Carlo gives -indeterminism, completion of all impregnations. Possibly the mental state wherein all concepts are available-connected, not where a limited number are given control as in working at specific task. Possibly this is meditative state.
Ayn 70 dictionary gives -eye- 70 appears in many “traditions” 70 years of Babelonian captivity—70 years of Russian Communist Experiment—70wise men learning tradition while Moses on mount Sinai.
Noun final—700 is found at end of an unlimited art: shoestore, bookstore, godstore-church; connection between concepts not limited.
Hhayt 8 Carlo gives undifferentiated pool of energy from which Tayt 9 constructs structures. He also writes Tayt as intuition. We will imagine 8 as energy of instincts. 80 would be instincts after training in existence.
Tsadde 90 would then be constructions—intuitions constructed from Phay.Note that the spelling of Aleph is ALP—1,30.80/800 which might suggest that the structure/intuition is product of period/duration of training.
Carlo mentions there is often no differentiation between 80 and 800 or 90 and 900;though written Torah would be explicitly different. Possibly we will awaken to the fact that when some state enters duration we lose nothing by considering it physical. Hhayt before any training would be inherited instincts—A in womb likely has been considered.
Writer feels that Kaballah is product of cabal—secret meeting of Jews keeping secrets—likely just discussing-creating Talmud. We will consider of some few Cabbalistic sayings anyway. For instance, “Bible stories are as garments about Torah.”
Jesus would agree the Life was in the soul, the body, His body.
Stories
are as garments of spirit-breath.
Carlo gives “cabbalists” credit for all this intellectual-intuitive written system. He bad-mouths,blames the psyche-mind for all misunderstandings, creating a master male/god.. He doesn't blame Pharasees, Talmudists. Jesus wouldn't blame Mary's image of the Lord in her psyche. He did blame the group written to accuse Him of having talking before He was “50”.
The “traditional” Messiah, MSHh, 40,300,8 would appear when the whole world accepted him then there would be 1000 years of peace. Oh yeah, an empire would have established acceptable justice systems in all lands of the peoples accepting the MSHh. The Romans were working on Pax Romana.
Jesus was written to have said, “I came not to bring peace.” The 70 wise men at Sinai were verbally given this tradition. The tradition holds there is always living a person capable of being accepted as the MSHh. The Maamar Veaadata in library of chabad.org was delivered in a Moscow Synagogue in 1897. It defines ALHYM translated -God in BRASYT—In the beginning. The ability to define/limit. Definitely a human ability. The motive for this web page is to attract people interested in discussing these possibilities.
The nine columns of first and second row and first four of the third have specific names. The last five of third row have five of the 22 specific names and the word final as they only appear t the end of a “word”--glyph group. This can be seen visually on page 65 in Carlo Suares' book Cipher of Genesis and psych.com.
Carlo claims that this code has been “opened” to the world a few times when there appeare a novel representation system; he mentions Christ as an exponent of Greek-think; Plato is given credit for the three in one god. Carlo is obviously implying it was “opened” to him as an exponent of Jungian Psychology. Obvious that someone gave him the giver's opinion. There's no indication that Carlo “figured out” the definitions of the symbols himself. He does not indicate he has studied a Hebrew/French or English dictionary. He writes that one who understands the system will recognize the element in his own thinking. This writer feels that his definitions are less ambiguous than those offered by Carlo and better agreeing with the dictionaries.
Aleph cypher value one dictionary gives –training--. Intelligence defined as ability to be trained
Yod duration of training a recording—in brain, book,etc.
Qof cypher value 100 –physically it is student aping teacher
Bayt cypher value two. A concept, symbol for a group of similar things. Dictionary gives container, in. In the container of similar things.
Kaf cypher value 2. concept existing between beginning and ending is definitely room for thought.
Raysh cypher value 200 stories hint this can describe lung physical thought-spirit container.
Ghimmel Carlo gives –spirit--
Lammed—30 Dict. Gives teaching, learning out with old, in with new. An organ transforms in process. Air pressure transformed to varied output of frequencies of pressures. N.T. writers tell us Pharisees couldn't take back 30 moneys because it was blood moneys. In allegory blood is teaching/learning of soul.
Sheen 300 stories give “breath of god”, breath physically in and out of lungs-breath physical organic activity of learning.
Dallet 4 form Plato used term; Writer has no definition. Carlo notes that YHWH with S before W is translated Christ; with D after W translated Judah, Judas, Jew.
Mem 40 stories mention womb.It is a duration of forming.
Tav 400 Carlo wrote that physicists would recognize this as -force- At least that is physical.
Hay 5 Carlo gives life. Propagation? Life in thought, spirit uses memory-symbol.
Noun 50 Writer hasn't worked to find indication that a noun brings a thing into life in existence.
Kaf final 500. Living idea physically. expressed
Waw-Vav 6 AND, copulation
Sammekh 60 Carlo writes “female element of coupling.” Receptive?
Zayn 7 Carlo gives -indeterminism, completion of all impregnations. Possibly the mental state wherein all concepts are available-connected, not where a limited number are given control as in working at specific task. Possibly this is meditative state.
Ayn 70 dictionary gives -eye- 70 appears in many “traditions” 70 years of Babelonian captivity—70 years of Russian Communist Experiment—70wise men learning tradition while Moses on mount Sinai.
Noun final—700 is found at end of an unlimited art: shoestore, bookstore, godstore-church; connection between concepts not limited.
Hhayt 8 Carlo gives undifferentiated pool of energy from which Tayt 9 constructs structures. He also writes Tayt as intuition. We will imagine 8 as energy of instincts. 80 would be instincts after training in existence.
Tsadde 90 would then be constructions—intuitions constructed from Phay.Note that the spelling of Aleph is ALP—1,30.80/800 which might suggest that the structure/intuition is product of period/duration of training.
Carlo mentions there is often no differentiation between 80 and 800 or 90 and 900;though written Torah would be explicitly different. Possibly we will awaken to the fact that when some state enters duration we lose nothing by considering it physical. Hhayt before any training would be inherited instincts—A in womb likely has been considered.
Writer feels that Kaballah is product of cabal—secret meeting of Jews keeping secrets—likely just discussing-creating Talmud. We will consider of some few Cabbalistic sayings anyway. For instance, “Bible stories are as garments about Torah.”
Jesus would agree the Life was in the soul, the body, His body.
Stories
are as garments of spirit-breath.
Carlo gives “cabbalists” credit for all this intellectual-intuitive written system. He bad-mouths,blames the psyche-mind for all misunderstandings, creating a master male/god.. He doesn't blame Pharasees, Talmudists. Jesus wouldn't blame Mary's image of the Lord in her psyche. He did blame the group written to accuse Him of having talking before He was “50”.
The “traditional” Messiah, MSHh, 40,300,8 would appear when the whole world accepted him then there would be 1000 years of peace. Oh yeah, an empire would have established acceptable justice systems in all lands of the peoples accepting the MSHh. The Romans were working on Pax Romana.
Jesus was written to have said, “I came not to bring peace.” The 70 wise men at Sinai were verbally given this tradition. The tradition holds there is always living a person capable of being accepted as the MSHh. The Maamar Veaadata in library of chabad.org was delivered in a Moscow Synagogue in 1897. It defines ALHYM translated -God in BRASYT—In the beginning. The ability to define/limit. Definitely a human ability. The motive for this web page is to attract people interested in discussing these possibilities.